L’éducation numérique et les enjeux de l’école du futur : la Tunisie comme exemple
Abstract
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are currently affecting every aspect of human life. They play a prominent role in the workplace, business, education and entertainment. In addition, many see ICTs as catalysts for change; changing working conditions, information processing and exchange, teaching methods, learning styles, scientific research and access to information and communication technologies. In the digital age, the use of ICTs in the classroom is important to provide students with the opportunity to acquire and apply the required skills of the 21st century. ICTs enhance teaching and learning and are important for teachers to exercise their role as creators of educational environments. ICTs help the teacher to deliver instruction in an engaging and conducive way to learners at all levels of educational programs. Today in Tunisia, training programs that make them useful and attractive are provided under the term ICT. It is clear that information and communication technologies represented by the Internet and interactive multimedia constitute an important axis of future education and must be effectively integrated into formal teaching and learning; especially in teacher training institutions.In the context of the competence-based approach chosen and applied in the Tunisian educational system, we will examine in this article the following problems: a) What is the reality of the use of ICT in the Tunisian educational establishment ? b) To what extent do teachers use ICT in their educational models? c) What are the challenges of the project to create a digital school (the school of the future) from the point of view of teachers and all stakeholders in the Tunisian educational system ?
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, R., Aloesnita, N., Mohd Alwi, N., & Newton, J. (2005). Task complexity effects on the complexity and accuracy of writing via text chat. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 64-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.002.
Adi, Y. K., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Muslim. (2023). Students’ visual representation of lights and vision. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8546-8553. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5240.
Armakolas, S., Karfaki, E., & Gomatos, L. (2021). Resistance to change and transformational learning in distance education. Mediterranean Journal of Education, 1(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.26220/mje.3833.
Bouchrika, I. (2024). What is eLearning? Types, advantages, and drawbacks in 2024. https://research.com/education/what-is-elearning.
Burgos, D. (2020). L'apprentissage en ligne, une réelle avancée pour une éducation innovante. Distances et Médiations des Savoirs. http://journals.openedition.org/dms/5152.
Burguete, E., & Urrego, V. (2023). Contextes et stratégies de médiatisation des MOOC de France Université Numérique : Influences sur la conception et la scénarisation pédagogique. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 17(2), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.4527.
Christian, D., & Elke N. (2008). Formations hybrides et interactions en ligne du point de vue de l'enseignant : pratiques, représentations, évolutions. Alsic. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication, 11(1), 61-92.
Clayton, J. F. (2008). Education, the Internet, and the World Wide Web. IGI Global.
Encarnacion, R. E., Galang, A. D., & Hallar, B. A. (2021). The impact and
effectiveness of e-learning on teaching and learning. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5(1), 383-397.
Fragkiadaki, G., & Ravanis, K. (2016). Genetic research methodology meets Early Childhood Science Education Research: A Cultural-Historical study of child’s scientific thinking development. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 12(3), 310-330. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120319.
Gordin, D. N., Gomez, L. M., Pea, R. D., & Fishman, B. J. (1996). Using the World Wide Web to build learning communities in K-12. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00188.x.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus Constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology and Research and Development, 39, 5-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296434.
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3.
Hudon, P. O. (2017). L’utilisation du chat pour développer et évaluer la compétence « pratiquer le dialogue » dans le cours éthique et culture religieuse. Essai, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Irwansyah, F. S., Lubab, I., Farida, I., & Ramdhan, M. A. (2017). Designing interactive electronic module in Chemistry lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012009.
Lafleur, F., & Samson, G. (2019). Formation et apprentissage en ligne. Canada: Presses de l’Université de Québec.
Lamba, P. (2011). Teleconferencing in medical education: A useful tool. Australasian Medical Journal, 4(8), 442-477.
Marquis, C., & Poellhuber, B. (2023). Le changement des conceptions des étudiants de sciences du collégial à l’égard de la structure de l’atome en lien avec les pratiques enseignantes : une analyse qualitative. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 17(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.4320.
Medi, M. (2017). Pratiques de mobilisation des ressources cognitives et techniques de transfert. ISEFC, Bardou, Tunisie.
Medi, M. (2022). Utilisation des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication dans l’éducation et la formation dans le système scolaire tunisien : Un projet innovatif. Mediterranean Journal of Education, 2(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.26220/mje.3850.
Niari, M. (2021). To use or not use collaborative learning techniques in teleconference teaching? A case study from the Hellenic Open University. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(1), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i1.443.
N’Djoli, J., Benabdelouahab, F., Zerhane, R., & Janati-Idrissi, R. (2021). Vers l'usage des simulateurs informatiques comme solution palliative aux problèmes de manque de travaux pratiques des sciences physiques à l’ISTA/Kinshasa. Mediterranean Journal of Education, 1(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.26220/mje.3957.
Noesgaard, S., & Orngree, R. (2015). The effectiveness of e-Learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. The Electronic Journal of eLearning, 3(4), 278-290.
Otero, M. R., Gazzola, M. P., Castro Filho, J. A., & Gomez, A. S. (2024). Teaching and learning mathematics using digital games in the classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 18(2), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.5065.
Ouarzeddine, Α. (2021). Initiation à l’approche hypothético-déductive en formation initiale des futurs enseignants de physique aux écoles normales supérieures en Algérie. Mediterranean Journal of Education, 1(2), 179-189.
Ouasri, A. (2017). Analyse des difficultés des élèves marocains de 15-16 ans en résolution de problèmes de mécanique (mouvement et repos, interactions mécaniques et forces, poids et masse). Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 11(2), 69-92.
Picciano, A. G. (2006). Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 85-91. URL http://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i3.1758
Rahmawati, I., Nisrina, N., Rezalul, & Abdani, M. (2022). Multi-representation-based interactive physics electronic module as teaching materials in online learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 11(1), 47-55.
Ravanis, K. (2020). Precursor models of the Physical Sciences in Early Childhood Education students’ thinking. Science Education Research and Praxis, 76, 24-31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345693326_Ravanis_K_2020_Precursor_models_of_the_Physical_Sciences_in_Early_Childhood_Education_students%27_thinking_Science_Education_Research_and_Praxis_76_24-31.
Ravanis, K. Charalampopoulou, C. Boilevin, J.-M. & Bagakis, G. (2005). La construction de la formation des ombres chez la pensée des enfants de 5-6 ans : Procédures didactiques sociocognitives. Revue de Recherches en Éducation: Spirale, 36, 87-98. https://www.persee.fr/doc/spira_0994-3722_2005_num_36_1_1327.
Sauvé, L. (2014). Des dispositifs en ligne pour personnaliser l’apprentissage tout au long de la vie : quelques recommandations. Distances et Médiations des Savoirs, 5. http://journals.openedition.org/dms/629.
Tiwari, R. K., Gupta, A., & Tiwari, V. (2015). Teleconferencing, an important tool of information technology, its use in medical education: A review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education, 1(1), 276-287.
Tudor, E. (2024). Qu’est-ce que l’apprentissage mixte ? À quoi ressemble-t-il en classe ? https://www.ef.fr/blog/teacherzone/apprentissage-mixte/.
Yeşiltaş, H. M., & Taş, E. (2021). Evaluation of material supported virtual reality and animation on 6th grade students’ success, cognitive levels and loads in the unit of circulatory system. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 15(2), 31-60.
Yulando, S., Sutopo, & Chi, T. F. (2019). Electronic Module design and development: An interactive learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 694-698.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/mje.5264
View Counter: Abstract | 0 | times, and PDF | 0 | times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Mediterranean Journal of Education | ISSN: 2732-6489 | Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.
Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras